Prosperous Period for American Billionaires: Why the Economic Structure Sustains Wealth Inequality

Among countless individuals in the United States, the financial landscape over the last half-decade has been challenging. Prices have escalated while pay remains unchanged. Elevated mortgage rates have made purchasing property a bleak prospect. The unemployment rate has been creeping up.

The majority of individuals have reported they're postponing major life decisions, including raising children or switching jobs, because of economic uncertainty. But for a select few of people, the last five years couldn't have been any better.

Wealth Explosion

The assets of the world's billionaires expanded 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even amid all the economic instability, the stock market has only kept rising. This expansion has largely benefited just a limited group of Americans: 10% of the population controls 93% of stock market wealth.

As uneven as this division seems, it's the system working as it is presently configured.

"Rich elites have acquired their jets, they've bought their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're acquiring senators and media outlets," stated economic inequality analyst Chuck Collins. "We're now stepping into this other chapter of extreme wealth extraction where the wealthy are taking advantage of the system of inequality."

Understanding Wealth Tiers

To help others understand what exactly it means to be "rich" in the US, Collins adopts a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, imagined the different levels of wealth as "Richistan" villages: Affluent Town, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.

To modernize the concept, Collins categorizes these "affluence districts" based on income levels:

  • At the foundation, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a household income of at least $110,000 and an net worth of over $1.5m.
  • The villages get more restricted as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
  • Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
  • Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.

Collectively, the residents of these villages make up the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their experiences vary dramatically.

"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still sitting in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins noted. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're flying in a private jet. That's a really different cultural experience. You fly private, you have no interest in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system collapses – you're set."

The Billionaireville Effect

The summit in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's richest. The control that this group has far surpasses those who are simply wealthy, let alone the average American who doesn't live in "Richistan" at all.

But Collins thinks the progressive slogan "end extreme wealth" fails to address the core issue and has a "suggestion of eradication" to it.

"It's the distinction between private conduct and a system of rules," Collins said. "We should be concerned about an economic system that funnels so much wealth upward to the billionaires."

The Four Pillars of Billionaire Wealth

To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins divides it into four parts: getting the wealth, protecting assets, government influence and extreme wealth removal.

When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think only about the first step, Collins said. People can create a limited sum of wealth through creating or operating a successful business, which could get them admission in Affluent Town.

But getting to Billionaireville requires significant resources and tactics in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their knowledge to ensure that the super rich are being calculated about their taxes.

"Wealth defense professionals use a broad range of tools such as trusts, offshore bank accounts, secret corporations, charitable foundations and other methods to hold assets," he writes.

Government Power and Extreme Wealth Removal

To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs policy assistance. Wealth of over $40m converts to political power, Collins says, and can be used to protect assets and protect its accumulation.

The last stage is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "extreme removal" to describe how the wealthy have come to touch nearly every single part of an Americans' daily existence largely through capital management, which allows wealthy individuals to fund private companies.

"Private equity is seeking those areas of the economy where they can extract value a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people comprehend is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is parked in so few hands, and they can essentially pivot and say, 'Where else can we extract profits out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can increase their costs."

Tangible Effects

The effects of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people spending additional funds for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any meaningful wage increases. And Collins said the hardship and discontent of this kind of society can lead to serious unrest.

"The most powerful oligarchs understand people are being marginalized [and] are monetarily hurting," Collins said, adding that conservative politicians have been good at connecting with a potent "phony populism".

Government Truth

The paradox, Collins points out in his book, is that government officials have appointed a succession of billionaires to cabinet positions. Along with tech billionaires who had short yet influential roles overseeing massive cuts to the federal workforce, other crucial appointments for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.

This administrative framework, along with help from legislative supporters, helped pass huge tax bills, which will make permanent tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations.

Future Solutions

While political parties continue to argue that immigration and bad trade agreements are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the challenge is: Will the opposing party, which has also been influenced by the billionaires and big money, be able to seriously confront the underlying harms?" Collins said.

Liberal leaders, he argues, know what policies are needed to "change wealth distribution", including significant reforms to the tax system, increasing the minimum wage and supporting labor organizations.

"It was so, so close, and the legislation really did represent the will of the most of people who really want lawmakers to solve some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Wealthy influence is not about creating so much as blocking. It's easier to block than it is to make something meaningful happen, but the muscle memory is there. We know what that looks like."

Collins is positive that there can be change, but said it would require ongoing legislative effort.

"It may be before we know it that the tide turns, and then it really is about sustaining a sustained really popular movement to make progress on this severe disparity we're living in," he said. "We can solve this. It is solvable."

Michael Barker
Michael Barker

A passionate horticulturist and sustainability advocate with over a decade of experience in organic gardening and environmental education.